From development environments to continuous integration—the ultimate guide to software development with Guix
Guix is a handy tool for developers; guix shell
,
in particular, gives a standalone development environment for your
package, no matter what language(s) it’s written in. To benefit from
it, you have to initially write a package definition and have it either
in Guix proper, in a channel, or directly upstream as a guix.scm
file.
This last option is appealing: all developers have to do to get set up
is clone the project's repository and run guix shell
, with no
arguments—we looked at the rationale for guix shell
in an earlier
article.
Development needs go beyond development environments though. How can developers perform continuous integration of their code in Guix build environments? How can they deliver their code straight to adventurous users? This post describes a set of files developers can add to their repository to set up Guix-based development environments, continuous integration, and continuous delivery—all at once.
Update: Check out the Cookbook for an up-to-date and translated version of this tutorial!
Getting started
How do we go about “Guixifying” a repository? The first step, as we’ve
seen, will be to add a guix.scm
at the root of the repository in
question. We’ll take Guile
as an example in this post: it’s written in Scheme (mostly) and C, and
has a number of dependencies—a C compilation tool chain, C libraries,
Autoconf and its friends, LaTeX, and so on. The resulting guix.scm
looks like the usual package
definition,
just without the define-public
bit:
;; The ‘guix.scm’ file for Guile, for use by ‘guix shell’.
(use-modules (guix)
(guix build-system gnu)
((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
(gnu packages autotools)
(gnu packages base)
(gnu packages bash)
(gnu packages bdw-gc)
(gnu packages compression)
(gnu packages flex)
(gnu packages gdb)
(gnu packages gettext)
(gnu packages gperf)
(gnu packages libffi)
(gnu packages libunistring)
(gnu packages linux)
(gnu packages pkg-config)
(gnu packages readline)
(gnu packages tex)
(gnu packages texinfo)
(gnu packages version-control))
(package
(name "guile")
(version "3.0.99-git") ;funky version number
(source #f) ;no source
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(native-inputs
(append (list autoconf
automake
libtool
gnu-gettext
flex
texinfo
texlive-base ;for "make pdf"
texlive-epsf
gperf
git
gdb
strace
readline
lzip
pkg-config)
;; When cross-compiling, a native version of Guile itself is
;; needed.
(if (%current-target-system)
(list this-package)
'())))
(inputs
(list libffi bash-minimal))
(propagated-inputs
(list libunistring libgc))
(native-search-paths
(list (search-path-specification
(variable "GUILE_LOAD_PATH")
(files '("share/guile/site/3.0")))
(search-path-specification
(variable "GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH")
(files '("lib/guile/3.0/site-ccache")))))
(synopsis "Scheme implementation intended especially for extensions")
(description
"Guile is the GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions,
and it's actually a full-blown Scheme implementation!")
(home-page "https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/")
(license license:lgpl3+))
Quite a bit of boilerplate, but now someone who’d like to hack on Guile just needs to run:
guix shell
That gives them a shell containing all the dependencies of Guile: those listed above, but also implicit dependencies such as the GCC tool chain, GNU Make, sed, grep, and so on. The chef’s recommendation:
guix shell --container --link-profile
That gives a shell in an isolated container, and all the dependencies
show up in $HOME/.guix-profile
, which plays well with caches such as
config.cache
and absolute file names recorded in generated Makefile
s and the likes.
The fact that the shell runs in a container brings peace of mind:
nothing but the current directory and Guile’s dependencies is visible
inside the container; nothing from the system can possibly interfere
with your development.
Level 1: Building with Guix
Now that we have a package definition, why not also take advantage of it
so we can build Guile with Guix? We had left the source
field empty,
because guix shell
above only cares about the inputs of our
package—so it can set up the development environment—not about the
package itself.
To build the package with Guix, we’ll need to fill out the source
field, along these lines:
(use-modules (guix)
(guix git-download) ;for ‘git-predicate’
…)
(define vcs-file?
;; Return true if the given file is under version control.
(or (git-predicate (current-source-directory))
(const #t))) ;not in a Git checkout
(package
(name "guile")
(version "3.0.99-git") ;funky version number
(source (local-file "." "guile-checkout"
#:recursive? #t
#:select? vcs-file?))
…)
Here’s what we changed:
- We added
(guix git-download)
to our set of imported modules, so we can use itsgit-predicate
procedure. - We defined
vcs-file?
as a procedure that returns true when passed a file that is under version control. For good measure, we add a fallback case for when we’re not in a Git checkout: always return true. - We set
source
to alocal-file
—a recursive copy of the current directory ("."
), limited to files under version control (the#:select?
bit).
From there on, our guix.scm
file serves a second purpose: it lets us
build the software with Guix. The whole point of building with Guix is
that it’s a “clean” build—you can be sure nothing from your working tree
or system interferes with the build result—and it lets you test a
variety of things. First, you can do a plain native build:
guix build -f guix.scm
But you can also build for another system (possibly after setting up offloading or transparent emulation):
guix build -f guix.scm -s aarch64-linux -s riscv64-linux
… or cross-compile:
guix build -f guix.scm --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32
You can also use package transformation options to test package variants:
# What if we built with Clang instead of GCC?
guix build -f guix.scm \
--with-c-toolchain=guile@3.0.99-git=clang-toolchain
# What about that under-tested configure flag?
guix build -f guix.scm \
--with-configure-flag=guile@3.0.99-git=--disable-networking
Handy!
Level 2: The repository as a channel
We now have a Git repository containing (among other things) a package
definition. Can’t we turn it into a
channel?
After all, channels are designed to ship package definitions to users,
and that’s exactly what we’re doing with our guix.scm
.
Turns out we can indeed turn it into a channel, but with one caveat: we
must create a separate directory for the .scm
file(s) of our channel
so that guix pull
doesn’t load unrelated .scm
files when
someone pulls the channel—and in Guile, there are lots of them! So
we’ll start like this, keeping a top-level guix.scm
symlink for the
sake of guix shell
:
mkdir -p .guix/modules
mv guix.scm .guix/modules/guile-package.scm
ln -s .guix/modules/guile-package.scm guix.scm
To make it usable as part of a channel, we
need to turn our guix.scm
file into a
module:
we do that by changing the use-modules
form at the top to a
define-module
form. We also need to actually export a package
variable, with define-public
, while still returning the package value
at the end of the file so we can still use guix shell
and guix build -f guix.scm
. The end result looks like this (not repeating things that
haven’t changed):
(define-module (guile-package)
#:use-module (guix)
#:use-module (guix git-download) ;for ‘git-predicate’
…)
(define vcs-file?
;; Return true if the given file is under version control.
(or (git-predicate (dirname (dirname (current-source-directory))))
(const #t))) ;not in a Git checkout
(define-public guile
(package
(name "guile")
(version "3.0.99-git") ;funky version number
(source (local-file "../.." "guile-checkout"
#:recursive? #t
#:select? vcs-file?))
…))
;; Return the package object define above at the end of the module.
guile
We need one last thing: a .guix-channel
file
so Guix knows where to look for package modules in our repository:
;; This file lets us present this repo as a Guix channel.
(channel
(version 0)
(directory ".guix/modules")) ;look for package modules under .guix/modules/
To recap, we now have these files:
.
├── .guix-channel
├── guix.scm → .guix/modules/guile-package.scm
└── .guix
└── modules
└── guile-package.scm
And that’s it: we have a channel! (We could do better and support
channel
authentication
so users know they’re pulling genuine code. We’ll spare you the details
here but it’s worth considering!) Users can pull from this channel by
adding it to
~/.config/guix/channels.scm
,
along these lines:
(append (list (channel
(name 'guile)
(url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git")
(branch "main")))
%default-channels)
After running guix pull
, we can see the new package:
$ guix describe
Generation 264 May 26 2023 16:00:35 (current)
guile 36fd2b4
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git
branch: main
commit: 36fd2b4920ae926c79b936c29e739e71a6dff2bc
guix c5bc698
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
commit: c5bc698e8922d78ed85989985cc2ceb034de2f23
$ guix package -A ^guile$
guile 3.0.99-git out,debug guile-package.scm:51:4
guile 3.0.9 out,debug gnu/packages/guile.scm:317:2
guile 2.2.7 out,debug gnu/packages/guile.scm:258:2
guile 2.2.4 out,debug gnu/packages/guile.scm:304:2
guile 2.0.14 out,debug gnu/packages/guile.scm:148:2
guile 1.8.8 out gnu/packages/guile.scm:77:2
$ guix build guile@3.0.99-git
[…]
/gnu/store/axnzbl89yz7ld78bmx72vpqp802dwsar-guile-3.0.99-git-debug
/gnu/store/r34gsij7f0glg2fbakcmmk0zn4v62s5w-guile-3.0.99-git
That’s how, as a developer, you get your software delivered directly into the hands of users! No intermediaries, yet no loss of transparency and provenance tracking.
With that in place, it also becomes trivial for anyone to create Docker
images, Deb/RPM packages, or a plain tarball with guix pack
:
# How about a Docker image of our Guile snapshot?
guix pack -f docker -S /bin=bin guile@3.0.99-git
# And a relocatable RPM?
guix pack -f rpm -R -S /bin=bin guile@3.0.99-git
Bonus: Package variants
We now have an actual channel, but it contains only one package. While
we’re at it, we can define package
variants
in our guile-package.scm
file, variants that we want to be able to
test as Guile developers—similar to what we did above with
transformation options. We can add them like so:
;; This is the ‘.guix/modules/guile-package.scm’ file.
(define-module (guile-package)
…)
(define-public guile
…)
(define (package-with-configure-flags p flags)
"Return P with FLAGS as additional 'configure' flags."
(package/inherit p
(arguments
(substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments p)
((#:configure-flags original-flags #~(list))
#~(append #$original-flags #$flags))))))
(define-public guile-without-threads
(package
(inherit (package-with-configure-flags guile
#~(list "--without-threads")))
(name "guile-without-threads")))
(define-public guile-without-networking
(package
(inherit (package-with-configure-flags guile
#~(list "--disable-networking")))
(name "guile-without-networking")))
;; Return the package object defined above at the end of the module.
guile
We can build these variants as regular packages once we’ve pulled the channel. Alternatively, from a checkout of Guile, we can run a command like this one from the top level:
guix build -L $PWD/.guix/modules guile-without-threads
Level 3: Setting up continuous integration
This channel becomes even more interesting once we set up continuous integration (CI). There are several ways to do that.
You can use one of the mainstream continuous integration tools, such as GitLab-CI. To do that, you need to make sure you run jobs in a Docker image or virtual machine that has Guix installed. If we were to do that in the case of Guile, we’d have a job that runs a shell command like this one:
guix build -L $PWD/.guix/modules guile@3.0.99-git
Doing this works great and has the advantage of being easy to achieve on your favorite CI platform.
That said, you’ll really get the most of it by using Cuirass, a CI tool designed for and tightly integrated with Guix. Using it is more work than using a hosted CI tool because you first need to set it up, but that setup phase is greatly simplified if you use its Guix System service. Going back to our example, we give Cuirass a spec file that goes like this:
;; Cuirass spec file to build all the packages of the ‘guile’ channel.
(list (specification
(name "guile")
(build '(channels guile))
(channels
(append (list (channel
(name 'guile)
(url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git")
(branch "main")))
%default-channels))))
It differs from what you’d do with other CI tools in two important ways:
- Cuirass knows it’s tracking two channels,
guile
andguix
. Indeed, our ownguile
package depends on many packages provided by theguix
channel—GCC, the GNU libc, libffi, and so on. Changes to packages from theguix
channel can potentially influence ourguile
build and this is something we’d like to see as soon as possible as Guile developers. - Build results are not thrown away: they can be distributed as
substitutes
so that users of our
guile
channel transparently get pre-built binaries!
From a developer’s viewpoint, the end result is this status
page listing evaluations: each
evaluation is a combination of commits of the guix
and guile
channels providing a number of jobs—one job per package defined in
guile-package.scm
times the number of target architectures.
As for substitutes, they come for free! As an example, since our
guile
jobset is built on ci.guix.gnu.org, which runs guix publish
in addition to Cuirass, one automatically gets substitutes for guile
builds from ci.guix.gnu.org; no additional work is needed for that.
Bonus: Build manifest
The Cuirass spec above is convenient: it builds every package in our channel, which includes a few variants. However, this might be insufficiently expressive in some cases: one might want specific cross-compilation jobs, transformations, Docker images, RPM/Deb packages, or even system tests.
To achieve that, you can write a manifest. The one we have for Guile has entries for the package variants we defined above, as well as additional variants and cross builds:
;; This is ‘.guix/manifest.scm’.
(use-modules (guix)
(guix profiles)
(guile-package)) ;import our own package module
(define* (package->manifest-entry* package system
#:key target)
"Return a manifest entry for PACKAGE on SYSTEM, optionally cross-compiled to
TARGET."
(manifest-entry
(inherit (package->manifest-entry package))
(name (string-append (package-name package) "." system
(if target
(string-append "." target)
"")))
(item (with-parameters ((%current-system system)
(%current-target-system target))
package))))
(define native-builds
(manifest
(append (map (lambda (system)
(package->manifest-entry* guile system))
'("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"
"aarch64-linux" "armhf-linux"
"powerpc64le-linux"))
(map (lambda (guile)
(package->manifest-entry* guile "x86_64-linux"))
(cons (package
(inherit (package-with-c-toolchain
guile
`(("clang-toolchain"
,(specification->package
"clang-toolchain")))))
(name "guile-clang"))
(list guile-without-threads
guile-without-networking
guile-debug
guile-strict-typing))))))
(define cross-builds
(manifest
(map (lambda (target)
(package->manifest-entry* guile "x86_64-linux"
#:target target))
'("i586-pc-gnu"
"aarch64-linux-gnu"
"riscv64-linux-gnu"
"i686-w64-mingw32"
"x86_64-linux-gnu"))))
(concatenate-manifests (list native-builds cross-builds))
We won’t go into the details of this manifest; suffice to say that it provides additional flexibility. We now need to tell Cuirass to build this manifest, which is done with a spec slightly different from the previous one:
;; Cuirass spec file to build all the packages of the ‘guile’ channel.
(list (specification
(name "guile")
(build '(manifest ".guix/manifest.scm"))
(channels
(append (list (channel
(name 'guile)
(url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git")
(branch "main")))
%default-channels))))
We changed the (build …)
part of the spec to '(manifest ".guix/manifest.scm")
so that it would pick our manifest, and that’s
it!
Wrapping up
We picked Guile as the running example in this post and you can see the result here:
.guix-channel
;.guix/modules/guile-package.scm
with the top-levelguix.scm
symlink;.guix/manifest.scm
.
These days, repositories are commonly peppered with dot files for
various tools: .envrc
, .gitlab-ci.yml
, .github/workflows
,
Dockerfile
, .buildpacks
, Aptfile
, requirements.txt
, and whatnot.
It may sound like we’re proposing a bunch of additional files, but in
fact those files are expressive enough to supersede most or all of
those listed above.
With a couple of files, we get support for:
- development environments (
guix shell
); - pristine test builds, including for package variants and for
cross-compilation (
guix build
); - continuous integration (with Cuirass or with some other tool);
- continuous delivery to users (via the channel and with pre-built binaries);
- generation of derivative build artifacts such as Docker images or
Deb/RPM packages (
guix pack
).
At the Guix headquarters, we’re quite happy about the result. We’ve been building a unified tool set for reproducible software deployment; this is an illustration of how you as a developer can benefit from it!
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Attila Lendvai, Brian Cully, and Ricardo Wurmus for providing feedback on an earlier draft of this post.
About GNU Guix
GNU Guix is a transactional package manager and an advanced distribution of the GNU system that respects user freedom. Guix can be used on top of any system running the Hurd or the Linux kernel, or it can be used as a standalone operating system distribution for i686, x86_64, ARMv7, AArch64 and POWER9 machines.
In addition to standard package management features, Guix supports transactional upgrades and roll-backs, unprivileged package management, per-user profiles, and garbage collection. When used as a standalone GNU/Linux distribution, Guix offers a declarative, stateless approach to operating system configuration management. Guix is highly customizable and hackable through Guile programming interfaces and extensions to the Scheme language.
Wenn nicht anders angegeben, sind Blogeinträge auf diesem Webauftritt urheberrechtlich geschützt zugunsten ihrer jeweiligen Verfasser und veröffentlicht zu den Bedingungen der Lizenz CC-BY-SA 4.0 und der GNU Free Documentation License (Version 1.3 der Lizenz oder einer späteren Version, ohne unveränderliche Abschnitte, ohne vorderen Umschlagtext und ohne hinteren Umschlagtext).